Europe achieved its lowest yet bid for an offshore wind power project last week, in a German auction in the North Sea, which backs up a recent trend of cost reductions.

Germany held its first so-called “reverse auction” for offshore wind, shifting from feed-in tariff schemes, in a wider European approach intended to drive down costs. The German auction achieved an average bid of €4.4 per megawatt hour – including three bids at zero euros and one bid for €60 – which follows a general trend of lower prices in similar auctions in Denmark and the Netherlands.

In Germany, the bids are on top of the wholesale power price. As a result, the bids for zero euros will receive only the wholesale power price. In Denmark and the Netherlands, bids are an all-in amount, which comprises the wholesale power price, plus a “sliding tariff” which tops up the difference to the bid amount.

In all three countries, successful bidders will receive a free onshore and offshore grid connection and connecting sub-sea cable. As a result, a bid of zero euros, as in Germany last week, is not exactly unsubsidised.

In addition, we should be aware that offshore wind projects take a while to build: last week’s German auction was for projects to be completed by 2025 at the latest. As a result, the auction revealed the cost of offshore wind, not today, but in up to eight years’ time; that’s assuming the projects are built at all, which no doubt will depend on the trend in wholesale power prices.

Notwithstanding these caveats, costs for offshore wind appear to be falling. Perhaps most significantly, competitive auctions have driven down the support price demanded by developers, compared with previous, publicly administered prices under former, fixed feed-in tariff schemes. In addition, a step-change in turbine sizes has helped, with turbines now around 8 megawatts up from 3-4 MW a few years ago. And rising investor confidence has driven down costs of capital.

Cost reductions are good news for renewable energy growth in north European countries, where winter peak demand coupled with northern latitudes make solar power a more medium-term prospect.

These countries have access to robust offshore wind resources in the shallows of the North Sea encircled by Britain, Norway and northern continental Europe.

In a notable advantage over other variable renewables, offshore wind fulfils a much greater proportion of its theoretical nameplate capacity – called load factor – compared with solar and onshore wind power, because the wind at sea blows stronger, more often. Britain is the world leader in offshore wind deployments, with more than 5 gigawatts installed. In Britain, load factors last year were 37% for offshore wind, versus 24% for onshore wind, and 11% for solar.

Figure 1 below shows the recent cost trend in Denmark, Netherlands and Germany. Britain is included noticing that its regime pricing includes the costs of the offshore grid connection, making direct comparison difficult. In the case of Germany, we include last week’s maximum and minimum bids (€60 and €0 per MWh), and add a hypothetical power price of €50/MWh, reflecting expectations for much higher German power prices in the 2020s.

Figure 1. Bids in offshore wind reverse auctions since 2010, Denmark, Netherlands, Germany

(this blog was first <a href=””>published in IEEFA</a>)    Send article as PDF   
  • Tags:
  • Britain ,
  • Denmark ,
  • Europe ,
  • germany ,
  • Netherlands ,
  • offshore wind ,
  • wind ,


  1. I have to agree with you about a carbon tax. Currently the fossil fuel companies are not paying the full price for their material. As a general principle the disposal costs of any product should be included as part of production cost.
    Optionally the producer would have to dispose of the unwanted by-products in a safe manner. We used to pay 2d for the bottle our drink came in and we would be refunded if we returned the bottle to the retailer.

Leave a Reply